Page 35 - مجلة الدراسات القضائية
P. 35

                                              
                                                         
                      
                                                          
                    
                                                        
            
                                                          
                
                                                        
                       
                                                          playboy  
                         
                                                        
 
                                                                         
                  
                                                            
                           
                                                                     
                         
                                          
                                                          Nominative Fair Use
1- Playboy Enterprises v. Netscape                       
   Communications, 354 F. 3d 1020 - Court                   
   of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2004; See also: See           
   Also: Brookfield Communications v. West               
   Coast Entertainment, 174 F. 3d 1036 - Court          
   of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1999; Promatek               
   Industries, Ltd. V. Equitrac Corp., 300 F. 3d
   808 - Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2002;
   Horphag Research LTD. V. Pellegrini, 337
   F. 3d 1036 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
   2003; Thane Intern., Inc. V. Trek Bicycle
   Corp., 305 F. 3d 894 - Court of Appeals, 9th
   circuit 2002; Lopez v. Smith, 203 F. 3d 1122
   - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2000; Abdul-
   Jabbar v. General Motors Corp., 85 F. 3d 407
   - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1996;; New
   kids on The Block v. New America Pub.,
   Inc., 971 F. 2d 302 - Court of Appeals, 9th
   Circuit 1992; Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue,
   inc., 537 us 418 - Supreme Court 2003;
   Panavision Intern., LP v. Toeppen, 141 F. 3d
   1316 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1998

                                              


   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40