Page 22 - مجلة الدراسات القضائية

 Blockbuster    
 
     


 West Coast  


    
   Blockbuster 


West     
    Coast
 Brookfield  
 
West Coast   
 
   Brookfield 
 
 
     
    West Coast
  
    
2- Brookfield Communications, Inc. V. West
Coast Entertainment Corp., 174 F.3d 1036
(9th Cir. 1999); See also: ROTHMAN (J. E.);
Op. Cit., PP. 117– 121; PAYLAGO (S. U.);
Op., Cit., P. 48; SAUNDERS (K. M.); Op., Cit.,

 
 



 
 
 
 

West Coast
Blockbuster
                
   West Coast 


 West Coast   
      

    West Coast

1- MCCARTHY (TH.); Op. Cit., P. 2.03; TUCCI
(V.); The Case of the Invisible Infringer:
Metatags, Trademark Infringement and
False Designation of Origin, Journal of
Technology Law & Policy, Issue No. 2,
2000, P. 54; SIDBURY (B. F.); Op. Cit., P. 53;
MAYNARD (B.J.); Note, The Initial Interest
Confusion Doctrine and Trademark
Infringement on the Internet, Washington
& Lee Law Review, Vol. 57, 2000, P. 1303;
SHARROCK (L.M.); Realigning the Initial
Interest Confusion Doctrine With the
Lanham Act, Whittier Law Review, Vol. 25,
2003, P. 73.