Appeal
in Cassation No. 81 of 2019 Civil
Court
Panel: Presided by Judge Shehab Abdul Rahman Al Hamadi - Chief Judge of the
Circuit - with the membership of judges: Al Hassan Bin Al Arabi Faydi and Jomaa
Ibrahim Mohammed Rashed.
Appeal
“date”. Payment order. Notification. Bylaws of the Civil Procedure
Law “application”. Judgment “deficient causation.”
Reversal “of the accepted grounds”.
-
Date of the appeal in cassation of the payment order is fifteen days from the
day following the notification of the convicted debtor of the payment order. The
notification shall be in person according to Article 65 of the bylaws of the
Civil Procedure Law.
-
The Court shall verify the notification of the order issued and that it was
correctly notified until the date of appeal in cassation becomes effective,
considering that the verification is one of the requirements of forfeiture of
the right of appeal.
-
The contested judgment ruling the forfeiture of the right to appeal without
stating if the Appellant in cassation was notified of the payment order and
stated only a small expression that the appeal was made after the specified
date, entailing the forfeiture of right. Nullifying neglect. It shall be
reversed.
Whereas
it is legally prescribed that the date of the appeal in cassation of the payment
order is fifteen days starting from the day following the notification of the
convicted debtor of the payment order. The notification of the payment order
shall be in person according to the provisions and methods stated in the bylaws,
as per Article 65 of the bylaws of the Civil Procedure Law. Thus, the Court
shall verify that the Appellant in cassation is notified of the order issued
against him and that he was correctly notified until the date of appeal in
cassation becomes effective, considering that the verification is one of the
requirements of forfeiture of the right of appeal, necessary to determine if the
litigant had the order issued against him and was validly declared to him or
not. Whereas the contested judgment ruled the forfeiture of the right to appeal
without stating if the Appellant in cassation was notified of the payment order
and stated only a small expression that the appeal was made after the specified
date, entailing the forfeiture of the right, then it is defective by nullifying
neglect and shall be reversed.
Whereas,
in the facts - as apparent in the contested judgment and the rest of the
documents - the Respondent submitted a payment order no. 1857 of 2019 requesting
the issuance of an order to compel the Appellant in cassation to pay him the
amount of AED 3,376,550 by virtue of cheques issued by him as they were
presented to the drawee bank and they were rejected due to insufficient funds.
On 22/4/2019, the magistrate of summary justice issued his order to compel the
Defendant (Appellant in cassation) to pay to the Plaintiff (Respondent) the
claimed amount with a legal interest of 5% from the due date until final
settlement, along with the expenses. The Appellant in cassation filed his
grievance against the said order before the Court of First Instance requesting
to cancel such order for lack of capacity and that the cheque drawer is
......... Construction Contracting Company. The Court of First Instance ruled
that it has no specific competence to settle the grievance and referred it to
the competent Court of Appeal based on Article 85 of the Civil Procedure Law.
The Respondent appealed this judgment under appeal no. 1659 of 2019 and the
Appellant in cassation appealed it under no. 1694 of 2019. On 24/12/2019, the
Court of Appeal ruled the following:
First:
In the subject of appeal no. 1659 of 2019, to accept it in the form and in the
matter, to reject the appealed judgment and re-rule that the appeal shall not be
settled as it was not handled in the legal manner, while compelling the
Respondent to pay the appeal fees and expenses and an amount of five hundred
Dirhams for the attorney’s fees.
Second:
In the subject of appeal no. 1694 of 2019, to forfeit the right of appeal for
filing the same after expiry of the period, while compelling the Appellant to
pay the fees and expenses of his appeal.
The
Appellant in cassation appealed this judgment through cassation and whereas the
appeal was submitted to this Court in a Council Chamber, the latter deemed that
the appeal in cassation deserves consideration and specified a hearing to be
announced to the parties.
Whereas
the Appellant in cassation objects to the contested judgment for violation of
the Law and deficiency in reasoning, as it ruled the forfeiture of his appeal
filed on the order issued against him in absentia and the judgment was based on
the reasons thereof that the appeal was filed on 15/09/2019, fifteen days after
the date of being aware of the payment order, while it is proved in the
documents that the Appellant in cassation was not notified in person of the
payment order as per Article 65 of the bylaws of the Civil Procedure Law, then
it violated the Law and it shall be reversed.
Whereas
this objection is valid, as
it is legally
prescribed that the date of appeal in cassation of the payment order shall be
fifteen days from the day following the announcement of the payment order to the
convicted debtor.
The
announcement of the payment order in person shall be according to the provisions
and methods stated in the bylaws as per Article 65 of the bylaws of the Civil
Procedure Law. Thus, the Court shall verify that the Appellant in cassation is
notified of the order issued against him and that he was correctly notified
until the date of appeal in cassation becomes effective, considering that the
verification is one of the requirements of forfeiture of the right of appeal,
necessary to determine if the litigant had the order issued against him and was
validly declared to him or not.
Whereas
the contested judgment ruled the forfeiture of the right to appeal without
stating if the Appellant in cassation was notified of the payment order and
stated only a small expression that the appeal was made after the specified
date, entailing the forfeiture of the right, then it is defective by nullifying
neglect and shall be reversed with referral.