وزارة العدل - الإمارات العربية المتحدة
اشترك فى النشرة الإخبارية
البريد الإلكترونى
تسجيل
لقد تم الاشتراك بنجاح.
بحث بالصوت
كلمات بحث مقترحة
الأسئلة الأكثر شيوعاً
القوانين والتشريعات
أحكام المحاكم
المشورات الالكترونية
مراكز سعادة المتعاملين
خدمات لـِ
الافراد
الحكومية
الأعمال
روابط سريعة
الاستعلام عن حالة قضية
حساب الرسوم القضائية
الكاتب العدل الإلكتروني
نظام المحامي الذكي
نظام الزواج
بحث متقدم
|
إغلاق
اللون المفضل
اللون الأخضر
اللون الأحمر
اللون الذهبي
خيارات إمكانية الوصول
عمى الألوان
تكبير الخط
تصغير الخط
ترجم هذه الصفحة
القراءة الليلية
فتح
غلق
جولة إرشادية
الفيديو الإرشادي
إطبع هذه الصفحة
اعادة الضبط
استمع لهذه الصفحة
X
تسجيل الدخول - بوابة خدمات الوزارة الموحدة
تسجيل الدخول - نظام رفع الدعاوى
English
رقم
نوع
تاريخ
High Courts Decisions - Constitutional
High Courts Decisions - Civil
High Courts Decisions - Criminal
2020
Constitutional Interpretation Request No. 2 of 2020 Issued on 27/04/2020
1- Determining the sources of jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court over the constitutional interpretation request.
2- The scope of jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court over the constitutional interpretation request is limited to interpreting the provisions of the Constitution without the provisions of the laws.
3- The constitutional interpretation request shall not be deemed of a judicial aspect, as it will be examined by the constitutional circuit of the Federal Supreme Court upon submitting a request for interpretation of a constitutional text by the federal government or one of its authorities or the governments of the emirates of the Union, with no need for the existence of a disagreement or dispute; rather, it is sufficient to have different opinions about a constitutional text.
4- The interpretation of the Constitution shall be considered as a request in kind, wherein the party requests the clarification of ambiguity or confusion in the text required to be clarified.
5- Determining the cases that necessitate the request for interpretation of the constitution.
6- The constitutional interpretation request extends to the implicit meaning and requirements of the text, which are not set forth explicitly, but are rather addressed implicitly by the provisions that address cases of emergency.
7- Upon interpreting the texts of the Constitution, the Federal Supreme Court has jurisdiction over clarifying ambiguous phrases and inferring the significance thereof according to the interpretation methods in order to investigate the meaning and purposes thereof.
8- It is permissible to use procedural and preventive means in emergency cases represented by the emerging Coronavirus pandemic, including modern technical means and visual communication that all State institutions have used to carry out governmental and institutional tasks, for fear of infection of their employees or those dealing therewith and in order to avoid its dire effects in case they are present in one place.
9- The National Assembly of the Union may use as exception, the means of remote modern technology, provided that this exception is subject to the continuance of the emergency, with respect to its sessions, the manner they are held, deliberations in the presence of the majority of its members, and achieving the principle of publicity or secrecy of the sessions stipulated in Articles 75, 86 and 87 of the Constitution regarding the exceptional emergency situation represented by the Coronavirus pandemic.
2019
2018
2017
2016
2013
2012
1992
1990
1987
1979